If you searched for call recording laws in NZ, the short answer is that New Zealand lets a participant record their own call. Australia is messier: the rule changes by state and territory, and the safe business practice is the same everywhere. Tell every caller, up front, that the call is recorded, and give them a way to say no.

We’re 42Voice, and we build AI voice agents that answer calls for Australian small and medium businesses. Recording and transcripts come with that work, so this guide covers both countries, then what we’d put in place if you take calls on either side of the Tasman. It is general information, not legal advice. For a specific situation, talk to a lawyer who practises privacy or telecommunications law.

42voice
Build Better Call Handling
42Voice builds AI voice agents for bookings, enquiries and customer support, with human handoff when a call needs personal attention.

Table of Contents

The short version

  • New Zealand: one-party consent. A person who is part of the call can record it. Privacy rules still apply to what you do with the recording.
  • Australia: no single national rule. Queensland, Victoria and the Northern Territory are generally treated as one-party; NSW, South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania and the ACT are generally treated as all-party. Check the detail below, because the sources do not agree on every jurisdiction.
  • Calls across borders or state lines: assume the strictest rule applies and get consent from everyone.
  • Business practice: play a clear notice at the start, say why you record, offer a non-recorded option, and secure and delete recordings on a schedule.

New Zealand: what the law says

New Zealand’s rule sits in section 216B of the Crimes Act 1961. It makes it an offence to intentionally intercept a private communication with a device, but the prohibition does not apply to a party to the communication. According to a summary of the New Zealand recording laws, that makes New Zealand a one-party consent jurisdiction. Recording a conversation you are not part of carries up to two years in prison.

So a business owner who takes a call and records it is on solid ground under the Crimes Act. A third party who taps the line is not.

The Privacy Act 2020 still applies

Being allowed to record is only half of it. Once you record a customer, you are collecting personal information, and the Privacy Act 2020 governs how. The Privacy Commissioner’s guidance on information privacy principle 4 says personal information must be collected lawfully and in a way that is fair and reasonable in the circumstances. Covert collection is the kind of thing that tends to fail that test.

The practical result: even where the Crimes Act would let you record silently, a business that does so is taking a privacy risk it doesn’t need to take. Most New Zealand businesses open the call with a short notice for exactly that reason.

Australia: two layers of law

Australian readers (and Australian businesses calling New Zealand customers) deal with something more fragmented. There are two layers.

  1. Federal telecommunications law. The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 generally prohibits third-party interception of telecommunications. It is not aimed at a party recording the call at their own handset.
  2. State and territory surveillance or listening device laws. These are the rules that decide whether you can record a private conversation, and they differ. According to Lexology’s summary of Australian recording law, no federal law stops a participant recording their own private conversation, but the recording has to comply with the state or territory legislation that applies.

How the states and territories differ

One industry guide groups the jurisdictions like this: Queensland and Victoria require one-party consent, while NSW, South Australia, Western Australia, Tasmania, the ACT and the Northern Territory require all-party consent. Other summaries read the Northern Territory differently. One international summary says the Victorian, Queensland and Northern Territory Acts do not prohibit a party from recording a conversation. It also says that in NSW, Tasmania and the ACT, recording a conversation you are part of is prohibited by default, but excused where the recording is not made to communicate or publish it to non-parties.

That disagreement is the point. The rules turn on drafting detail, exceptions and what you later do with the recording, so a one-line label per state is a starting point only.

Jurisdiction Commonly described as Law to check
Victoria One-party Surveillance Devices Act 1999
Queensland One-party Invasion of Privacy Act 1971
Northern Territory Sources differ Surveillance Devices Act 2007
New South Wales All-party, with exceptions Surveillance Devices Act 2007
ACT All-party, with exceptions Listening Devices Act 1992
SA, WA, Tasmania All-party, with exceptions State listening or surveillance device Acts

Victoria’s legislation shows how the one-party label works. Section 6 of the Surveillance Devices Act 1999 prohibits a person who is not a party from recording a private conversation unless each party consents. That generally lets a participant record their own call, but limits remain on communicating or publishing the recording. The Victorian legal aid service says communicating or publishing a private-conversation recording is generally prohibited unless everyone involved agrees or an exemption applies.

What if the call crosses a border or state line?

This is where businesses get caught. A Sydney clinic ringing a patient in Brisbane, or a Melbourne agency calling a customer in Auckland, has two sets of rules in play. Meridian Lawyers says that when people in different states are on one call, the law of the state tied to the person recording generally applies, but the safest approach is consent from everyone.

Cross-border recording rules and consent guidance

For New Zealand callers the same logic holds. New Zealand’s one-party rule doesn’t protect you from an Australian state’s rule if your own recording happens in an all-party state. Treat the strictest rule as your rule.

Why “tell everyone” is the practical answer

No business wants to keep a map of ten jurisdictions in its head. Your reception staff and your AI agents shouldn’t have to either. One policy works everywhere: tell every caller, at the start, that the call is recorded.

This also lines up with health privacy. For clinics, the OAIC says a telephone consultation must not be recorded without informing the patient, and that at the start the person must have the chance to end the call or ask not to be recorded.

There is a liability angle too. If a company fails to exercise due diligence on recording laws, its officers can be held liable for the company’s offences. For an owner-operator, that is you.

What to say, and what to do when someone says no

What to say, and what to do when someone says no — overview diagram

A good notice is short, plain and prominent. Say it before any recording starts. Cover three things: the call is recorded, why, and how to opt out.

Here is a script that works for a trades business:

“Thanks for calling Harbour Plumbing. This call is recorded for quality and training. If you’d rather not be recorded, say so now and we’ll take your details another way.”

Sprintlaw’s guide advises clear, prominent notice that explains the purpose and offers a real choice to proceed without recording. If the caller refuses and you have no non-recorded option, you shouldn’t record. Emplawyer’s advice is the same: get consent through an automated opening message or by asking directly, and if the other party refuses, recording must not happen.

Build a non-recorded path

A refusal needs somewhere to go. Options that work for an SME:

  • A callback from a team member who takes notes by hand
  • A web form or email address for the same request
  • A chat channel on your website
  • A separate phone number that isn’t recorded

The same Sprintlaw guide notes that offering email, chat or a specific phone line without recording supports transparency. Write the path into your policy so staff know it before the first caller objects.

Storing, using and deleting recordings

The recording law covers making the recording. Privacy law covers what happens after. A tidy approach has four parts.

  1. Explain it. Your privacy notice should say what you collect, why, how it’s stored and used, and how a person can access or delete it. That is the transparency expectation Sprintlaw describes.
  2. Limit the purpose. If you told callers it’s for training and quality, don’t quietly use it for marketing.
  3. Secure it. Restrict who can listen, and log access.
  4. Set retention. Pick a period, delete on schedule and write down who owns the job.

Transcripts are personal information too, and they’re easier to search and copy than audio. Our guide to call transcript privacy controls walks through the four phases we use. If you want a wider view across jurisdictions, see our call recording consent rules.

When you change how recordings are used, update your notice before the change goes live. That applies when you add analytics or a new voice platform. The pace of telephony tooling is quick, as recent conversational AI telephony updates show, so review your notice whenever the tools behind your phones change.

A practical checklist for an Australian SME

Use this as a one-afternoon project.

  1. List every number that takes or makes calls, including mobiles used for work.
  2. Mark which calls cross state lines or the Tasman.
  3. Write the opening notice and agree the wording.
  4. Load it into your phone system or AI agent so it plays before recording starts.
  5. Create the non-recorded option and brief your staff.
  6. Update your privacy policy to describe recordings and transcripts.
  7. Set retention and deletion and assign an owner.
  8. Test with a real call and listen to what a caller hears.
  9. Review every six months, or when you change systems.

Outbound calls: extra considerations

Recording consent is one issue. If you call people to sell or collect, others sit beside it. Check your obligations under the Do Not Call Register rules, the Privacy Act and any expectations about disclosing that a caller is dealing with an AI agent. We’re not giving legal advice here, and these rules are a good reason to have a lawyer review your outbound scripts before launch. If collections is your concern, read how we approach compliant debt collection agents.

Where AI voice agents fit

An AI agent doesn’t change the consent rules. It makes them easier to follow, because the notice plays the same way on every call, at 2 am or 2 pm. A human receptionist forgets the line on a busy Monday. An agent doesn’t.

The human part still matters. Some calls need judgement: an upset patient, a complicated quote, a sensitive payment conversation. Those should go to a person, quickly and with context. Our notes on AI-to-human handoff cover how to design that.

Our perspective

Most owners we speak to ask the wrong question first. They ask “Am I allowed to record?” The better question is “Would the caller be surprised?” If the answer is yes, you have a problem even where the law technically allows it.

We design our agents around that. The call opens with a plain notice. Every agent is backed by human-in-the-loop quality review, so a person checks how calls are handled and the script is corrected where it falls short. Complex or sensitive calls hand off to your team. We don’t see AI as a replacement for your people. It takes the repetitive, high-volume calls, like bookings and account questions, so your staff can spend their time on the conversations where empathy and closing matter.

We’re also honest about limits. An agent shouldn’t decide a legal question, handle a distressed caller alone or negotiate a hardship arrangement. Build those exits in from day one. And because rules vary by state and country, we’d rather you confirm your wording with a lawyer than assume a platform setting makes you compliant.

— Alston

How 42Voice handles this for your business

Our AI Receptionist answers missed and after-hours calls, books into your calendar, updates your CRM and hands complex calls to your team. You choose the opening notice and the handoff rules, and we’re typically live in 3 to 5 days with no lock-in contract. Pricing is tailored to your business; see the plans for how it’s structured.

42voice

If you run a clinic, trade or hospitality venue, the notice and the non-recorded option are the two pieces we’d set up first.

FAQ

Generally yes, if you are part of the call. Section 216B of the Crimes Act 1961 exempts a party to the communication, so New Zealand is described as one-party consent. The Privacy Act 2020 still requires fair and lawful collection, so a clear notice is the safer practice for a business.

Can I record a call in Australia without telling the other person?

It depends on the state or territory. Some jurisdictions are described as one-party consent and others as all-party, and summaries differ on the detail. The safest course for a business is to tell the caller at the start and let them opt out.

What if the caller says they don’t want to be recorded?

Stop recording, or move them to a non-recorded channel such as a callback, email or chat. Guidance from Australian law firms says recording shouldn’t proceed if an external caller refuses. Write this into your policy so staff and AI agents handle it the same way.

Do call recording rules apply to AI voice agents?

Yes. The same consent and privacy obligations apply whether a person or an AI agent answers. The advantage is consistency: the notice plays on every call, and you can route sensitive calls to a human.

Book a free 15-minute demo

Want to hear how a compliant opening notice and human handoff sound on a real call? Book a free 15-minute demo and we’ll walk you through it.

Sources

42voice
Discuss Call Handling for Your Business
Email 42Voice to discuss how AI voice agents could handle repetitive calls while your team focuses on work requiring human judgment.

This article is general information about AI voice technology and isn’t legal or compliance advice. Requirements for call recording, AI disclosure and outbound calling vary by state and use case.